Using 15N Dilution Method to Correct for Microbial Contamination When Assessing in situ Protein Degradability of Fresh Ryegrass

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, New South Wales, Armidale, Australia

3 Department of Primary Industries, Beef Industry Centre of Excellence, New South Wales, Armidale, Australia

Abstract

This experiment was done to investigate microbial contamination and in situ disappearance rates of dry matter (DM), N and 15N of fresh labeled ryegrass. Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) were labeled with 15N during growth in a glasshouse, harvested at 4th leaves stage and were incubated up to 34 h in situ in the rumen of 3 individually housed sheep. The animals were fed 800 g/d chopped alfalfa and had free access to drinking water. Six bags were placed in the rumen of each sheep simultaneously and removed after 0, 3, 7, 12, 21 and 33 h after incubation. The results were fitted to a model describing the degradation of DM and total N with time. It was found that residues from the washed zero time bags had lower 15N enrichments (7.7% vs. 8.3% enriched) than the original fresh samples. Under-estimation of effective degradability (ED) of protein in fresh forages by about 4% would have potential consequences for predictions of ruminally fermentable and escape protein and thus for dietary protein feeding management. However, because the correction assumes contaminating microbial N is unlabeled, but microbes attached to labeled ryegrass would become labeled to some extent, the true error and effective degradability may still be underestimated. Studies with two markers would help us to better understand the errors associated with the in situ technique.

Keywords


INTRODUCTION

Current systems of protein evaluation in ruminants involve accurate estimates of both ruminal protein degradability and intestinal digestibility of the undegraded protein fraction of feedstuffs (Arroyo et al. 2009). In situ techniques mimic in vivo conditions and are widely adopted in most modern protein feeding systems (Jarrige, 1987). Estimation of ruminal degradability in situ may be affected by several factors (Colombini and Broderick, 2008). The effects of the method of preparation of fresh clover were compared by Cohen and Doyle (2001). They concluded that no sample preparation method will be ideal and that the preferred method for in situ studies will vary for fresh forages compared with conserved forages and concentrates. The isotope of nitrogen, 15N has been employed many times in plant physiology studies (Broadbent and Carlton 1980; Danso et al. 1988; Harris and Hesterman, 1990), but it has only infrequently been used to study ruminal metabolism of forages (Varvikko and Lindberg, 1985; Van Bruchem et al. 1997; Kamoun et al. 2014). The principle of the in situ method is that microbes should enter the bag and degrade the feed in a similar way to that if the feed was consumed directly by the animal. Mathers and Aitchison (1981) observed that residues remaining in the bags after incubation in the rumen were contaminated with microbial matter. Lower N content in forages and longer incubation period causes higher microbial contamination (González et al. 2007). A correction for this contamination should be considered when assessing N degradability values. The use of 15N appears to be a precise and consistent method of identifying microbial N (Kamoun et al. 2007). Natural labelling of forage N with 15N is an appropriate technique for studying metabolism of plant N (Hristov et al. 2001). Labelling the plant material with 15N will determine the extent of microbial 14N contamination in situ and from this, the errors in predicting effective degradability (ED) can be corrected. It is difficult to make field measurements of the ED of fresh forage ingested by grazing ruminants. The in situ technique is often used for estimating ruminal protein digestibility of forage samples, but microbial attachment to feed residues in the bags causes true degradability coefficients to be underestimated (Noceck and Grant, 1987). In addition, the forage samples are often dried or frozen before being placed in the bags and this may affect microbial attachment. Internal and external microbial markers have been used to correct for microbial contamination (Noceck and Grant, 1987). In this study, an alternative approach, i.e. labelling the plant material perennial ryegrass, (Lolium perenne) with 15N was used to determine the extent of microbial 14N contamination in situ and from this, the errors in predicting ED. The objective of this study was to investigate in situ disappearance rates of DM, N and 15N of fresh labeled ryegrass. It was assumed that the amount of 15N placed in the rumen in all of the bags was approximately similar to the amount when labeled forage ingested in vivo. Thus, the rumen microbes in the bags could be expected to be labeled to about the same extent and that there is microbial contamination in nylon bags incubation residues during estimating protein degradability values.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Planting and labelling fresh ryegrass

The ryegrass was grown in 4 L pots in a climate-controlled glass house (temperature and humidity were controlled). The soil used for planting was almost free of N and therefore, at the time of planting, 8 g of Multigro fertilizer (N=10.1%, P=3.5%, K=5.5%, S=16.3%, Ca=7.8%) was added to the pots. Ryegrass plants were cut for the first time at 30 d after planting when they were at the four-leaf stage. After the first harvest, pots were allocated at random to two groups; the first group was assigned to grow un-labeled ryegrass (control) and watered with tap water. The second group was assigned to grow labeled ryegrass. These pots were fertilized with a mixture of fertilizers including P, K, S, Ca (8.8, 50, 11 and 20%, respectively) and N was applied as 15NH415NO3. These pots were initially watered with 15NH415NO3 solution providing 30 mg 15N and a further 12 mg 15N was given to each pot weekly. The same quantity of un-labeled N was provided as fertilizer to the control plants.

 

In situ procedure

About 30 min after harvesting, 10 g of fresh ryegrass samples (13% dry matter (DM), 18% crude protein (CP), 15N enrichment=8.3%) were chopped by scissors to approximately 5 mm lengths and weighed into nylon bags (size 150 mm×80 mm, pore size 44 µ) together with a marble (about 5 g). The marble was added to ensure that the bags remained in the rumen digesta during incubation and to facilitate the removal of the bag from the rumen when the desired incubation periods had been ended. The bags were then tied firmly with a monofilament fishing line before being suspended in the rumen of the three male merino lambs (BW=27.7±SD 2.3 kg). All animal care, handling techniques, and surgical procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of The University of New England before the initiation of research and followed the guidelines issued by the committee on care, handling and sampling of the animals. Animals had free access to drinking water and received a basal diet of chopped alfalfa hay (800 g) daily at about 0900 h 00. Six bags were placed in the rumen of each sheep (each animal was considered as replicate) simultaneously and removed after 0, 3, 7, 12, 21 and 33 h after incubation. The bags were then washed thoroughly with running cold tap water while being squeezed gently until no more visible color came from the bags and their contents. Bags designated ‘time zero’ were never placed in the rumen, but were otherwise treated in exactly the same way as bags placed in the rumen. After drying (65 ˚C, 48 h), bags were cooled in a desiccator and weighed and the residues were used for N and 15N analysis.

 

In situ measurement

Chemical analysis

N concentrations in bag residues were determined on the dry samples after they had been ground to pass a 1 mm sieve (Foss Tecator, 1093 cyclotec sample mill). Total-N content of feed samples was determined on finely ground sample DM (1 mm sieve) either using an N analyzer (Leco FP 2000) or, when N was required for 15N analyses, by micro-Kjeldhal digestion followed by steam-distillation and titration of the resulting ammonia. Forage samples, in situ bag residues were analyzed to measure isotopic ratio (15N enrichment) by mass spectrometry (Tracermass; Europe Scientific Ltd). The 15N excess was calculated assuming a natural abundance of 0.3663 atoms percent.

 

Calculations

Rumen degradability parameters were calculated as the percentage of disappearance of DM, N and 15N from the bags at different times during incubation and fitted by the following equation (Orskov and McDonald, 1979):

Pt= a + b(1-exp-ct) Equation 1

Where:

Pt: indicates the percentage of the material disappearance from the bag at time t.

a: soluble potentially degradable fraction.

b: insoluble potentially degradable fraction.

c: degradation rate constant for fraction b.

The percentage disappearance with time values were fitted by using the ‘Neway’ program for Microsoft Excel (Chen, 1997).

Effective rumen degradabilities of DM and protein were calculated using the fractional outflow rate of solid from the rumen (kp) according to the following equation.

P= a + ((bc)/(c+kp))(1-e-ct) Equation 2

Where:

P: effective extent of degradation at time t(h).

kp: particle flow rate constant assumed to be 0.05/h (Hristov and Broderick 1996).

a: soluble potentially degradable fraction.

b: insoluble potentially degradable fraction.

c: degradation rate constant for fraction b.

Values for fractional loss of N and 15N from the bags during incubation were fitted by the equation 3 (Orskov and McDonald, 1979).

Fractional loss= a + b(1-exp-ct) Equation 3

The rumen microbial N (RMN15N) in the feed residues derived from 15N values, was calculated using the equation given by Varvikko and Lindberg (1985):

(1-(15N % of total residual N/15 N % of total original N) × 100) Equation 4

The percentage of error in the feed N loss estimates resulting from the microbial contamination of the feed sample residues was calculated from the following equation.

(1-(% 15N disappearance/% total N disappearance) × 100)

Equation 5

 

Statistical model and methods

Data were analyzed using the general linear models (GLM) procedure of (SAS, 2003) with the following statistical model:

Yijk= µ + treati + sheepij + periodijk + eijkh

Where:

Yijk: performance during the kth period of the ith treat and jth sheep, (i=1, 2; j=1, 2, .., ni; k=1, 2).

µ: overall mean effect.

Treati: effect of the ith treat (i=1, 2).

Sheepij: effect of the jth sheep on the ith treat, (j=1,…4).

Periodijk: effect of the kth period (k=1, 2).

eijk: random error.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In situ disappearance (%) of DM (●), N (○) and 15N is shown in Figure 1. There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 sheep (as replicates) in the values for DM, N and 15N disappearance during the in situ incubation of the fresh ryegrass. Therefore, the respective mean degradabilities of fresh ryegrass are presented in Figure 1.

 

Figure 1 In situ disappearance (%) of DM (●), N (○) and 15N (▼) for sheep

 

 

The 15N removal from the bag represents the loss of 15N ryegrass, but there would still be some 15N present in rumen bacteria. True values for 15N ryegrass N removal will be slightly higher than the 15N values shown here, i.e. close to 100%. However, in vivo, some soluble protein and peptides and AA will leave the rumen before being degraded. Apparent and corrected proportional N disappearance of in situ incubated fresh ryegrass is presented in Figure 2. Figure 2 shows both in situ apparent and corrected proportional N disappearance when the fresh ryegrass was incubated in sheep. Figure 3 shows the predicted ED of forage N (crude protein) before and after correction for microbial contamination, for various periods of digestion in the rumen. Values of fractional degradation rate (parameter kd) of potential and ED were significantly increased when a correction for microbial contamination of the residues was applied (Kamoun et al. 2014).

 

Figure 2 Mean (±SE) fresh ryegrass N disappearance (apparent ■, ___ fitted; corrected ▲, ---- fitted) from nylon bags in sheep

 

 

Figure 3 Effective degradability estimates at increasing ruminal outflow rates (true, ___ fitted; corrected, ---- fitted)

 

 

As it shown in Figure 3, N disappearance and ED of protein in fresh ryegrass were underestimated. Underestimation of ED of protein in fresh ryegrass by about 4% would have potential consequences for predictions of ruminally fermentable and escape protein and thus for dietary protein feeding management. However, because the correction assumes contaminating microbial N is unlabeled, but microbes attached to labeled ryegrass would become labeled to some extent, the true error (and ED) may still be underestimated. Studies with two markers would help us to better understand the errors associated with the in situ technique. Microbial contamination of feed residues is shown in Figure 4. Plant cell soluble protein had slightly higher 15N:14N than cell walls. After washing the zero time bags, it was found that plant residues from the washed zero time bags had slightly lower 15N concentration (7.7% enriched) than the original fresh samples (8.3% enriched). Results for incubated bag residues were corrected accordingly. After a lag period, microbial contamination in the bags increased over time (Figure 4).

 

Figure 4 Microbial contamination (microbial 14N: plant15N)

 

 

During ingestion of fresh forage by ruminants, there is considerable particle size reduction by mastication (Ulyatt et al. 1986) and about 60% of the cell contents of fresh herbages are released (Waghorn et al. 1989). Any type of sample preparation is likely to inadequately represent the processes of ingestion, formation of a bolus and swallowing. AFRC (1992) recommended that, for in situ estimation of CP degradation in grass and silage, samples should be chopped to lengths of about 1 cm. However, in this experiment the forages were chopped to about 5 mm to better simulate the chewing activity of sheep. Barrell et al. (2000) reported that ranking of forages for digestibility was affected by method of preparation and they considered that mincing is preferable to either chopping or freeze drying, as particle sizes are closer to those present in real rumen contents. Deinum and Maassen (1994) investigated the effects of different methods of sample preparation. They proposed for example, mincing causes more damage to the plant cells structure or grinding would have increased the surface area of plant cells exposed for microbial attack compared with chopping. Currently, none of the methods of sample preparation has been nominated as the preferred method. It is likely that the most appropriate method for in situ studies will vary depending on whether fresh herbages or conserved forages and concentrates are being incubated (AFRC, 1992). Microbial nitrogen yield (MN) is of great importance to protein metabolism in ruminants (Broderick et al. 2010). The quantification of its flow to the small intestine is therefore important in calculating the amount of digestible MN available to the animal. Various microbial markers (MM) can be used to estimate MN flow (Ipharraguerre et al. 2007). Among the techniques used, 15N, purine bases (PB), and urinary excretion of purine derivatives are the most common (Ma et al. 2014). The microbial contamination and adhesion sites are directly related to the nature of the plant tissues. In the adjusted models to predict the values of corrected fractions, certain variables were used to represent the cell wall and its qualities, including neutral detergent fiber (NDF), neutral detergent insoluble protein (NDIP) and indigestible neutral detergent fiber (iNDF) (Machado et al. 2013). The method using labeled forage sometimes gave lower rates of microbial contamination. Varvikko and Lindberg (1985) found that calculation of microbial colonization of feed residues in nylon bags using 15N dilution might lead to an underestimate due to the re-use of the feed 15N degraded inside the bags. However, Kamoun et al. (2007), using 15N-labeled ryegrass, reported a slight effect on estimation of microbial contamination of the residues on feed N degradability when microbes incorporate feed 15N. They also mentioned that, at early incubation times, the maximum value of incorporation was 5.7% of the 15N incubated in the bag and decreased progressively with incubation time. In their experiment Machado et al. (2013) concluded that A and B fractions and kd of CP could be highly biased by microbial CP contamination and therefore these corrected values could be obtained mathematically, replacing the use of microbial markers. In our experiment, during the first hour after incubation, the net disappearance of 15N was greater than of total N. This result could be explained by the entry of rumen micro-organisms which have unlabeled N into the bag. Therefore, the presence of unlabeled N would lead to an underestimation of true forage N degradability. The net disappearance rates ranked as follow: 15N > N > DM. Because total N and DM fractions left in the bags were contaminated with micro-organisms, their rate of apparent or net loss can be expected to be slower than for 15N, which is present only in plant N. The results of present study agree with the results of Varvikko and Lindberg (1985). In situ incubation has been widely used for estimation of feed DM and protein degradation in the rumen but microbial colonization of feed particles in the bag leads to an underestimate of protein degradability by adding non-plant N to the residual N inside the bags (Mathers and Aitchinson, 1981). Measures of contamination of feed residues in this current experiment suggest that, as the period of incubation became longer, disappearance of 15N from the bags decreased but the fraction present as microbial N increased. Microbial contamination correction is necessary for forage based diets but it has less importance when animal fed concentrate based diet (Krawielitzki et al. 2006). The level of microbial contamination increases with increasing incubation time and has been shown to be greater in substrates with high fiber and low N concentrations and the cellulose content is the main factor determining the accumulation of micro colonies in feed particles, which is also responsible for the accumulation of microbial N (Beckers et al. 1995; Rodríguez and González, 2006). Conversely, Mitchell et al. (1997) found that with increasing plant maturity the protein residue was contaminated to a lower extent by rumen microbes, and they suggested that higher lignification may be associated with lower bacterial colonization. In contrast, Hoffman et al. (1993) found no relationship between extent of bacterial CP and maturity stage of forage species and correction for bacterial CP decreased the estimated undegraded CP fraction. The ED of protein was consistently increased by microbial contamination correction, with values similar to those reported by González et al. (2007) and Kamoun et al. (2007). After 24 h incubation, forages residues were highly contaminated (up to 90%), which was in the same range as reported by Olubobokun et al. (1990). The correction of the microbial contamination taking place during rumen incubation has negative effects (P<0.05) not only on the rumen undegraded fraction but also on its intestinal effective degradability for all controlled fractions of wheat grain (Arroyo et al. 2009). According to the results it seems clear that, in the nylon bag technique microbial attachment to the feed residues may be an important source of error in quantitative feed protein degradation. The degradation results also show that the extent of error (%) in the N loss measurement depends on the N content of the feeds and on the rumen degradation rate. The very high contamination with microbial amino acids (AA) indicates unacceptable errors for the estimates of the rumen undegraded fraction, which furthermore were very variable between AA in both green and ensiled Italian ryegrass (González et al. 2009). Therefore, they concluded the need to correct the microbial contamination to obtain accurate estimates of the AA supply. In their experiment Arroyo et al. (2009) revealed that corrected values of intestinal digested CP, as an indicator for the protein value of wheat protein, is closely related to the microbial protein synthesis derived from its organic matter (OM) rumen fermentation. This synthesis and the content of intestinal digested undegraded protein may be respectively higher and lower than is usually assumed in feed tables. Therefore, accurate estimating of protein degradability of feedstuffs in the rumen need that incubation residues to be corrected for microbial contamination. Labeling methods using 15N as a marker are appropriate substitutes for determining microbial N in the residues. However, they are excessively expensive and time-consuming to be applied as routine techniques (Kamoun et al. 2014).

 

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, 15N can be used as a consistent marker to estimate the microbial N fraction of undigested residues in the nylon bags. True ED for fresh ryegrass was about 82% (about 4% higher than uncorrected ED) and may still be underestimated, however, because the 15N-based correction depends on the assumption that contaminating microbial N is unlabeled. It is likely that bacteria attached to digesting labeled ryegrass would become labeled to some extent. Experiments with alternative markers (eg. microbial purines) or more than one marker may help to provide further insights into the errors associated with the in situ technique. Because of the high quantity (about 95%) of microbial contamination achieved in this experiment on estimated N degradability, especially with fresh forages, it is necessary to consider microbial contamination in estimation of degradability parameters. Accuracy in estimating the extent of degradation of protein in the rumen from in situ disappearance curves is significantly improved when values are corrected for microbial contamination of the bag residue. However, considering the cost and labor required, simpler and cheaper methods would be desirable so that prediction of such microbial contamination is feasible under practical conditions.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to thank the University of New England for the support during doing this research.

AFRC. (1992). Agricultural and Food Research Council. AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Nutritive Requirements of Ruminant Animals: Protein. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 62, 787-835.
Arroyo J.M., González J., Rodríguez C.A., Alvir M.R. and Ouarti M. (2009). In situ evaluation of the protein value of wheat grain corrected for ruminal microbial contamination. J. Sci. Food Agric. 89, 731-734.
Barrell L.G., Burke J.L., Waghorn G.C., Attwood G.T. and Brookes I.M. (2000). Preparation of fresh forages for incubation and prediction of nutritive value. Pp. 5-8 in Proc. Soc. Anim. Prod. New Zealand.
Beckers Y., Thewis A., Maudoux B. and Francois E. (1995). Studies on the in situ nitrogen degradability corrected for bacterial contamination of concentrate feed in steers. J. Anim. Sci. 73, 220-227.
Broadbent F.E. and Carlton A.B. (1980). Methodology for field trials with nitrogen 15 depleted nitrogen. J. Environ. Qual. 9, 236-242.
Broderick G.A., Huhtanen P., Ahvenjarvi S., Reynal S.M. and Shingfield K.J. (2010). Quantifying ruminal nitrogen metabolism using the omasal sampling technique in cattle-a meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 3216-3230.
Chen X.B. (1997). Neway Excel, a Utility for Processing Data of Feed Degradability and in vitro Gas Production. Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, UK.
CohenD.C. and Doyle P.T. (2001). Effect of sample preparation on in situ estimates of protein degradability for white clover herbages. Australian J. Exp. Agric. 41, 619-624.
Colombini S. and Broderick G.A. (2008). In vitro ruminal protein degradation and microbial protein formation of seed legumes. J. Dairy Sci. 91(1), 43-51.
Danso S.K.A., Hardarson G. and Zapata F. (1988). Dinitrogen fixation estimates in alfalfa-ryegrass swards using different nitrogen-15 labeling methods. Crop. Sci. 28, 106-110.
Deinum B. and Maassen A. (1994). Effects of drying temperature on chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of forages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 46, 75-86.
González J., Paria-Marrnol J., Rodriguez C.A. and Martinez A. (2007). Effects of ensiling on ruminal degrada- ability and intestinal digestibility of Italian rye-grass. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 136, 38-50.
González J., Centeno C., Morujo N., Faría-Mármol J. and Martínez A. (2009). In situ ruminal amino acid degradability of green and ensiled Italian rye-grass according to particle transit model and microbial contamination correction. Livest. Sci. 123, 209-214.
Harris D.C. and Hesterman O.B. (1990). Quantifying the nitrogen contribution from alfalfa to soil and two succeeding crops using nitrogen-15. Agron. J. 82, 129-134.
Hoffman P.C., Sievert S.J., Shaver R.D., Welch D.A. and Combs D.K. (1993). In situ dry matter, protein and fiber degradation of perennial forages. J. Dairy Sci. 76, 2632-2643.
Hristov A.N. and Broderick G.A. (1996). Synthesis of microbial protein in ruminally cannulated cows fed alfalfa silage, alfalfa hay, or corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 79, 1627-1637.
Hristov A.N., Huhtanen P., Rode L.M., Acharya S.N. and McAllister T.A. (2001). Comparison of the ruminal metabolism of nitrogen from 15n labeled alfalfa preserved as hay or as silage. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 2738-2750.
Ipharraguerre I.R., Reynal S.M., Lineiro M. and Broderick G.A. (2007). A comparison of sampling sites, digesta and microbial markers and microbial references for assessing the post ruminal supple of nutrients in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 1904-1919.
Jarrige R. (1987). Ingestion et digestion des aliments. Pp. 29-56 in Alimentation des Bovins, Ovins et Caprins. R. Jarrige, Ed. INRA Publications, Paris, France.
Kamoun M., Ammar H., Théwis A., Beckers Y., France J. and López S. (2014). Comparison of three 15N methods to correct for microbial contamination when assessing in situ protein degradability of fresh forages. J. Anim. Sci. 92, 5053-5062.
Kamoun M., López S., Beckers Y., Lecomte P., Francois E. and Théwis A. (2007). Effect of feed 15N incorporation into solid-associated bacteria on the in situ nitrogen degradability of 15N labeled Italian ryegrass. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 135, 353-361.
Krawielitzki K., Schmidt T., Voigt J., Kowalczyk J. and Gabel M. (2006). Dynamics of microbial contamination of protein during ruminal in situ incubation of feedstuffs. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 15, 313-328.
Ma T., Deng K.D., Tu Y., Zhang N.F., Jiang C.G., Liu J., Zhao Y.G. and Diao Q.Y. (2014). Effect of dietary forage-to-concentrate ratios on urinary excretion of purine derivatives and microbial nitrogen yields in the rumen of Doper cross bred sheep. Livest. Sci. 160, 37-44.
Machado P.A.S., Valadares Filho S.C., Detmann E., SantosS.A., Valadares R.F.D., Ducatti C., Rotta P.P. and Costa e Silva L.F. (2013). Development of equations to estimate microbial contamination in ruminal incubation residues of forage produced under tropical conditions using N as a label. J. Anim. Sci. 91, 3836-3846.
Mathers J.C. and Aitchison E.M. (1981). Direct estimation of the extent of contamination of food residues by microbial matter after incubation within synthetic fiber bags in the rumen. J. Agric. Sci. 96, 691-693.
Mitchell R.B., Redfearn D.D., Moser L.E., Grant R.J., Moore K.J. and Kirch B.H. (1997). Relationships between in situ protein degradability and grass developmental morphology. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 1143-1149.
Noceck J.E. and Grant A.L. (1987). Characterization of in situ nitrogen and fiber digestion and bacterial nitrogen contamination of hay crop forages preserved at different dry matter percentages. J. Anim. Sci. 64, 552-564.
Olubobokun J.A., Craig W.M. and Pond K.R. (1990). Effects of mastication and microbial contamination on ruminal in situ forage disappearance. J. Anim. Sci. 68, 3371-3381.
Orskov E.R. and McDonaldI. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 92, 499-503.
Rodríguez C.A. and González J. (2006). In situ study of the relevance of bacterial adherence to feed particles for the contamination and accuracy of rumen degradability estimates for feeds vegetable origin. Br. J. Nutr. 96, 316-325.
SAS Institute. (2003). SAS®/STAT Software, Release 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. USA.
Ulyatt M., Dellow D., John A., Reid C. and Waghorn G. (1986). Contribution of chewing during eating and rumination to the clearance of digesta from the ruminoreticulum. Pp. 498-515 in Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants. L.P. Milligan, W.L. Grovum and A. Dobson, Eds. Prentice Hall Publication, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.
Van Bruchem J., Voigt J., Lammers-Wienhoven T.S.C.W., Schonhusen U., Ketelaars J.J.M.H. and Tamminga S. (1997). Secretion and reabsorption of endogenous protein along the small intestine of sheep: estimates derived from 15N dilution of plasma non-protein-N. Br. J. Nutr. 77, 273-286.
Varvikko T. and Lindberg J.E. (1985). Estimation of microbial nitrogen in nylon-bag residues by feed 15N dilution. Br. J. Nutr. 54, 473-481.
Waghorn G.C., Shelton I.D. and Thomas V.J. (1989). Particle breakdown and rumen digestion of fresh ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and lucerne (Medicago sativa) fed to cows during a restricted feeding period. Br. J. Nutr. 61, 409-423.