The “Male Effect” Onestrous Synchronization and Reproductive Characteristics of Female Markhoz Goat during the Breeding Season

 

Figure 1a and 1b Categorized schematic figure of experimental animals

1a) Stables 1: status of boxes for groups (A1, A2, A3, A4)

1b) Stable 2: status of boxes in 7 weeks for estrous synchronization using CIDR with or with-out male effect (B1, B2, B3) and the male effect groups (C1, C2) and control group (D)

A: experimental groups with different distance from the male animals

B: experimental groups which were synchronized using CIDR for 18 days with or without the male effect, their behavior was recorded from the beginning of the fourth week until the end of the seventh week

C: “male effect” in natural husbandry condition

N: number of goats in each box

-: wall and barrier, each box in the saloon was completely isolated from the others

Box x: number of experimental groups

 

Those showing estrous 48 hrs later received 100 points, thereafter the score was reduced by 4 points per day.  Those not showing estrous by 25 d received 0.0 points.

 

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted in SAS (2003) using the Proc FREQ, LOGESTIC, Mixed and GLM with the following model:

y_ijk= µ + Treat_i + Animal_j(Treat_i) + Time_k + (Treat×Time)_ik + e_ijk

Where:

Y_ijk: animal performance.

μ: population mean.

Treat_i: i treatment effect.

Animal_j (Treat_i): effect of j animal in i treatment.

Time_k: effect of k time.

(Treat×Time)_ik: interaction of treatment and time.

e_ijk: residual or error.

The data for kidding rate were modified by application of a log₁₀ transformation for homogeneity of variance. Duncan’s multiple range was used to determine significant differences between the means.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The number of goats showing estrous, number of pregnant goats, number of kids born, kidding rateand MER are shown in Table 1. The results showed a positive effect of male goat on sexual behavior and reproductive performance in female goats. Experimental treatment (male effect and CIDR with male effect) improved reproductive traits and had significant effects on the kidding rate (χ²=783.00, P<0.01). The male effect such as exposure of male goat to females (i.e. higher concentration of male pheromones, sound and viewing), short distance of female from male goats (treatment A1, A2) and sudden introduction of male goat in to females stables (treatment C2) caused better estrous synchronizing and kidding rate when compared withcontrol group (P<0.05).

 

Table 1 Response to male effect; number of goats in estrous, number of pregnant goats, number of kids born and kidding rate in each group (n=10 in all cases)

The means within the same column with at least one common letter, do not have significant difference (P>0.05).

¹ MER: male effect response or rapid response to male effect (first observation of onset of estrous after 48 horses of introducing of male goat, until 25 days).

A1, A2, A3, A4: male effect with changes of distances; B1, B2: CIDR with the male effect; B3: CIDR; C1, C2: male effect; D: control and C2 and B2: sudden introducing of male.

 

Also by measuring MER or rapid response of female to male effects (treatments A1, A2, C2), it was observed that the more females showed their reproductive cycle and time of onset of estrous in a short time (P<0.01, Table 1). The male effect caused considerable differences in blood estrogen concentrations (Table 2). There were significant differences in estrogen concentration among experimental groups during estrous (P<0.05). The goats in A1, A2, B1, B2 and C2 groups (the “male effect”) had highest estrogen concentrations (Table 2) resulting in an increase in the number of kids born (Table 1). Among the groups of male effect, in which females were exposed to male goat (i.e. higher concentration of male pheromones, sound and viewing), the animals with short distance from male goats (groups A1, A2) and sudden introducing of male goat into females (groups C2, B2) showed significantly higher concentrations of theestradiol-17 beta hormone (P<0.05, Table 2). Those groups which had highere strogen concentrations had also higher progesterone concentrations at the reproductive cycles (Table 3). Treatments which synchronizede strous by CIDR (B1, B2, and B3) and the “male effect” treatments, progesterone concentration in blood serum were more than other groups (Table 3). These changes in certain hormones concentrations are associated with improved fertility performance (Scaramuzzi et al. 2006). So indirectly we can suppose that the male effect and e.g. (higher concentrations of pheromone in the husbandry environment) induced reproductive cycle and more pulses of GnRH/LH which caused an increase in estrogen and progesterone (Table2). Therefore, we would observe an increase in estrous synchronize and more kidding rates (i.e. more ovulation) (Table1). Hamada et al. (1996) showed that exposure of female goats to the male goat hair leads to LH pulses in less than 2 minutes (Hamada et al. 1996). Increase infrequency of LH pulse, has been demonstrated to affect the GnRH/LH pulse insheep (Hamada et al. 1996; Over et al. 1990). These researchers found that there as on able cause of this behavior was pheromone in male goat hair. Delgadillo et al. (2009) showed in ewes, 6 h of contact with rams induces a rapid increase in LH secretion, but is not enough to provoke ovulation, and LH secretion returns to pre-stimulation levels after the male is removed. Pheromone with the scattering through the air that stimulates the neuroendocrine system in females, followed by release pulses of GnRH/LH stimulate andinduce ovarian activity and starting of reproductive cycle. The result of this experiment showed that the “male effect” affects the estrogen concentrations and other reproductive parameters by distance changes. The short distance between female and male goats (treatment A1, A2) was more effective than longer distance (treatment A3, A4) probably because of the amount of pheromone concentration in the environment (Mohamadi et al. 2011). Several studies have suggested that continuous presence of the male is required to maximize the endocrine or ovulatory responses of females to the male stimulus (Delgadillo et al. 2009; Hawken and Beard, 2009). Signoret et al. (1982) and Hawken and Beard (2009) determined  that  20%  of  ewes  ovulated  when  exposed  to teasers for 24 h, and that this increased to 51% for 4 days of exposure, and to 61% for 13 days of exposure. Four hours of daily contact with sexually active males is sufficient to stimulate ovulatory activity in female goats (Bedos et al. 2010). This effect was not due to the presence of olfactory cues from the males remaining in the pens, but it depends on the active presence of males for 4 hours (Bedos et al. 2010). The relationship between duration of male contact and the efficacy of the male stimulus is also evident in goats, where exposure to males for 16 h per day for 10 days induced ovulation in only 19% of goats, while continuous exposure induced ovulation in 95% of females (Walkden-Brown et al. 1993a).

 

Table 2 Comparison of serum estradiol-17 β concentration (Mean±SEM pg/mL) at three times after onset of estrous among the experimental groups

The means within the same column with at least one common letter, do not have significant difference (P>0.05).

SEM: standard error of the means.

CV: coefficient of variation.

A1, A2, A3, A4: male effect with changes of distances; B1, B2: CIDR with the male effect; B3: CIDR; C1, C2: male effect; D: control and C2 and B2: sudden introducing of male.

 

Table 3 Comparison of serum progesterone concentration (Mean±SEM ηg/mL) at three times after onset of estrous among the experimental groups

The means within the same column with at least one common letter, do not have significant difference (P>0.05).

SEM: standard error of the means.

CV: coefficient of variation.

A1, A2, A3, A4: male effect with changes of distances; B1, B2: CIDR with the male effect; B3: CIDR; C1, C2: male effect; D: control and C2 and B2: sudden introducing of male.

 

However, Rivas-Mu˜noz et al. (2007) reported that 95% of female goats ovulated in response to sexually active males, while only 15% responded to quiescent males indicating that, in goats at least, there is an interaction between sexual activity of the male and duration of daily exposure on the percentage of females responding to the male effect (Rivas-Mu˜noz et al. 2007). In the present study, similar to results obtained by Hawken and Beard (2009) and Delgadillo et al. (2009) the male effect had effectively stimulate on the reproductive behavior in the females. If we consider the four-week test period, the results of starting estrous in goats treatments A1, A2 and C2 were more effective than of test of Delgadillo et al. (2009) (Figures 1 and 2). Meanwhile, the goats which showed signs of estrous is continuous and long-term in control group and were less than a fore mentioned treatments, which implies endorsement male effect on the onset of estrous in female goat (P<0.01) and our results show significant differences between experimental groups in the early weeks of the experiment (Table 1 and Figures 1 and 2). This phenomen on indicates that the male effect not only caused an early time of onset of estrous accelerates but also increased estrous synchronization (P<0.05) thus increasing the chances of pregnancy and kidding rate (Table 1). The male effect treatments such as expose male goat with females (i.e. higher concentration of male pheromones, sound and viewing) in short distance of female from male goats (groups A1, A2) and sudden introduction of male goat in females group (C2) and the permanent presence of males goat in females group (C1), showed a greater number of goats estrous in a shorter time (Figures 1 and 2) and greater numbers of kids born (Table 1) therefore, long-term male effects on fertility is positive and was consistent with the findings Gillies et al. (2004) and Perkins and Fitzgerald (1994).

 

Figure 1 The effect of distance between male and female goats on the induction of estrus in female goats, after male introduction

 

 

Figure 2 Rate of female goats showed estrous during experiment in permanently presence male goats with females group (C1), sudden introduction of male goats into females’ stable (C2) and control group without any male effect (D)

 

The importance of the duration of male contact was also demonstrated in north of England mule ewes exposed to rams during the transition into the breeding season (Hawken and Beard, 2009). In another study, permanent ram presence led to a more synchronized distribution of estrous than short-term (24 h) exposure to rams repeated at 17-day intervals until mating (Hawken and Beard, 2009). As can be seen in figure 2, the slope of the curve in C2 treatment steeper than others, and in a shorter time 100% of  goats have shown signs of estrous and a significant difference was observed (P<0.05). While in group D, a gentler slope was observed over a longer period. It is observed in Figure1 that  less distance between males and females (i.e. higher concentration of male pheromones, sound and seeing ) in treatment A1 during the first 2 weeks have resumed 100 percentof their reproductive cycles and have shown signs of estrous and had significant difference with other treatments (P<0.01). While the treatments had a greater distance (A4) there was observed a longer time and gentler slopes with fewerestrous goats (Table 1 and Figure 1). This is important in relation to reproductive management of farm animals, as Gokuldas et al. (2010) showed that if Buffalo during postnatal constantly be exposed male effect, will resume faster their reproductive cycle, silent ovulation decreases and the first service will increase the chances of conception (Gokuldas et al. 2010).

The onset of estrous at the third week was observed in (D) (Figure 3).

 

Figure 3 The effect of season (environmental factors such as day length and temperature) on there productive cycle activation of females in control group and other females in the Markhoz goats flock

 

 

It occurred because of beginning of the breeding season due to climatic conditions in this area around the third week. The collected data showed that the breeding season of Markhoz goat beginning at early October, when the temperature decrease to 24 ˚C and time of brightness reduce to12 hours. Twenty days after initiation of the experiment (20 August) estrous in the control group (D) was observed (Figure 3). This was could be due to the effects of climate (temperature and day length). We conclude with are view of the status of onset of estrous in goats examined (Figure 4) that between 7 to 20 days of starting the test before the breeding season, male effects on females were meaningful and began the reproductive cycle. Furthermore, the curvein Figure 4 has a higher peak of male effect in the second week compared with peak season effect (the second wave of the curve). So in addition to the male effect increasing the onset of estrous, estrous synchronization power was more effective than the effect of the season.

 

Figure 4 Effects of “male effect” on reproductive cycle activation and onset of estrous in female Markhoz goats in male effect and control groups

 

 

In other words, we can say that the male effect leads to the early start of the reproductive season. Hawken and Baird (2009) showed that short-term exposure (24 h) of ewes and rams prior to the breeding season led to animals that were rapidly estrous synchronized (Hawken and Beard, 2009). Perkins and Fitzgerald (1994) found that when ewes exposed to rams in time of transition from the non-reproductive season to breeding season it stimulates estrous behavior in the females so that 17 to 24 days after exposure ewes showed estrous (Perkins and Fitzgerald, 1994). According to the researchers; olfactory signals would increase due to the further concentrations of pheromones and decreasing the distance from male (Hafez and Hafez, 2000). In fact female goats preferred the male goats with higher testosterone levels in the mating season. Studies indicate that females were potentially able to detect signals from male behavior (Longpre and Katz, 2011). The specific changes in reproductive activity in males and females at breeding season or non-reproductive season depend on the nutrition level (Walkden-Brown, 1994; Delgadillo et al. 2009; Mohamadi et al. 2011). Exposure of short term rams with ewes, the female tend to male animal (Choen-Tannoudij and Signoret, 1987) although exposure of males with females does not necessarily require previous separation (Cushwa et al. 1992). Bedos et al. (2010) study showed that, 4 h of daily contact with sexually active males is sufficient to stimulate ovulatory activity in anovulatory goats and this effect is not due to the presence of olfactory cues from the males remaining in the pens (Bedos et al. 2010). Also Delgadillo et al. (2009) showed that the entering a male goat in to a group of females which are at the end of the non-reproductive season, not only brings advances to the beginning of the breeding season for several days but also synchronizes their reproductive cycles. This phenomenon of male-induced synchrony is also evident in cyclic goats with a high proportion of females showing estrous within 6 days of male exposure (Choen-Tannoudij and Signoret, 1987; Delgadillo et al. 2009). Under  temperate  and  subtropical  latitudes,  ewes  and  goats  display  a  reproductive seasonal pattern and their sexual activity during the anestrous period can be stimulated and synchronized by the introduction of males in the group, which is called the “male effect”. The response of females to the male effect in the middle of the anestrous season is weak or absent. It may be due to a low quality stimulus provided by the male which is, as the females, in seasonal rest (Delgadillo et al. 2006) in female goats, there is strong evidence that the genotypic effect of seasonality on the responsiveness to the male effect can be circumvented by using sexually active males (Delgadillo et al. 2006). In the highly seasonal Saanen breed, a full ovulatory response was initially obtained after stimulation with males that had been treated with artificial light and melatonin during late anestrous, even though cyclicity could not be maintained if the females did not also receive a photoperiodic and melatonin treatment (Chemineau et al. 1986). In the seasonal Mexican mixed breed, the use of males rendered sexually active by a photoperiodic treatment leads to ovulation and conception during periods of anestrous when untreated males elicit no response (Delgadillo et al. 2006; Flores et al. 2000). These observations support those of Walkden-Brown et al. (1993b), who reported that seasonal variation in the responsiveness of females to the male effect in northern Australia can be avoided by using bucks in which reproductive function had been stimulated nutritionally (Delgadillo et al. 2009). However, the results of the present experiments (Figures 3 and 4) confirm that it can be employed males effect during the breeding season for estrus synchronization and increase oestrus in the early breeding season and kidding rate with natural control. It is recommended that male effect in subsequent experiments with environmental and climatic conditions (i.e. 25 August) is consistent with the estrous synchronization and kidding rate in Iran. Results of the using CIDR to synchronize estrous are shown in Figure 5. Considering that after 18 days in female genital tract and two days after taking CIDR, the estrous signs were observed in females. So, as expected, estrous synchronization lasted in female goats 20±0.5 days. However, significant differences were observed between treatments in the number of on set of estrous goats (P<0.05). Like third test, sudden appearance or entrance of a male goat in a females group in a day before CIDR-removal (treatment B2) synchronouse strous was 100% and increased kidding rate (Figure 5 and Table 1). B3 treatment had only synchronized by CIDR (non male effect) only70% of the goats showed signs of estrous after CIDR-removal (Figure 5).

 

Figure 5 Onset of estrous after removal of CIDR in female Markhoz goats at breeding season (%) n male effect and control groups

The superiority of the method using male effects is evident, when compared with CIDR group only (P<0.05). Because “male effect” caused on set of estrous in females after 15 days, lead to increasing number of female goats to cycle activation. Also the problems caused by the use of CIDR were eliminated. These problems include costs for purchasing CIDR and adverse events including. Infection of the uterus and vagina and protrusion or falling CIDR of genital tract. Infectious agents using CIDR can reduce reproductive performance in females (Lamb and Larson, 2004).

 

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates an improved reproductive efficiency particularly early estrous in breeding season, synchronized estrous and kidding rate by male effect. The male effect, compared with CIDR was more successful in inducing estrous activity and cyclist. Thus using males during the breeding season for early onset of estrous and estrous synchronization might increase the kidding rate in Markhoz goat. The male effect was more efficient when compared with synchronized female by CIDR in onset of estrous and also increased serum estrogen concentration in Markhoz goat during the follicular phase.