1Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ilorin, P.M.B. 1515, Ilorin, Nigeria
2Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture, University of Cape Coast, Ghana
Receive Date: 12 October 2013,
Revise Date: 08 December 2013,
Accept Date: 15 December 2013
Data collected in 2012 on 400 chickens were subjected to two-way analyses of variance to estimatebody weight, morphometric traits as well as the correlationbetween body weight and morphometric traitsin Isa Brown and Ilorin ecotypechickens. The studied morphometric traits were comb length, beak length,head length, neck length, body length, wing length, shank length, thigh length, toe length, breast length, and breast breadth. The results showed that genotype, sex and genotype × sex interaction significantly (P<0.05) affect body weight and morphometric trait measurements. Isa Brown chicken had a significantly higher (P<0.05) matured body weight than Ilorin ecotype birds. Isa Brown birdshadhigher (P<0.05) morphometric traitsthan Ilorin ecotype birds except for toe length. Male birdshad higher body weight (P<0.05) and were also higher in most of the morphometric trait measurements than female birds.Interactionsbetween genotype and sex weresignificant (P<0.05) for body weight and morphometric traits,except for breast length and breast breadth. Morphometric traits measured inyoung birds were significantly (P<0.05) correlated with body weight (0.68-0.95) except for wing lengthin Isa Brown and breast length in Ilorin ecotype chicken. Correlations between body weight and morphometric traits in adult Isa Brown birds were higher (0.27-0.95) than correlations between body weight and morphometric traits in Ilorin ecotype chicken (0.02-0.91). A significant negative correlation was obtained between body weight and beak length (-0.72) in Isa Brown and between body weight and wing length (-0.35) in Ilorin ecotype chicken. Morphometric traits measured on male birds were more highly correlated with body weight (0.68-0.95) than in female chickens,except for breast breadth. The present study showed that the two genotypes could be adequately characterised using morphometric indices. The study further revealed that morphometric indices like body length and comb length can be adequately usedto predict body weight of birds in the two genotypes.However, the negative correlation obtained between body weight and wing length in Ilorin ecotype chicken requiresfurther investigation to determine its basis for chicken adaptation.
Abdul-Rahman A.E. (1989). Significance of some major genes in relation to the productive adaptability of fourGermán sub linescompared with local Egyptian chickens. Ph D. Thesis. Fac. Agric, Assuit University, Egypt. Adebambo O.A., Ikeobi C.O.N., Ozoje M.O., Adenowo J.A. and Osinowo O.A. (1996). Variation in qualitativetraits and their effects on the performance of local ducks and turkeys. Nigerian J. Genet. 11, 20-23. Adeniji F.O. and Ayorinde K.L. (1990). Prediction of body weight from body measurements of chicken. NigerianJ. Anim.Prod. 17,42-47. Badubi S.S., Rakereng M. and Marumo M. (2006). Morphological traits and feed resources available forindigenous chickens in Botswana. Available in: http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/Irrdl8/l/badul8003. htm.Accessed May 2013. Broady T.B., Siegel P.B. and Cherry J.A. (1984). Age, body weight and body composition requirement for the onset of sexual maturity of dwarf and normal chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 25, 245-252. Chineke C.A., Agaviezor B.,Ikeobi C.O.N. and Ologun A.G. (2002). Some factors affecting body weight andmeasurements of rabbit at pre and postweaning ages. Pp. 1-3in Proc.27th Ann. Conf., Nig. Soc.Anim. Prod. Akure, Nigeria. Fayeye T.R. (2011). Methods of improving the performance of local chickens. Monthly KWADP SMS Workshop and General Meeting, June 30, 2911, Ilorin, Nigeria. Hassan W.A. and Adamu U.A. (1997). Pigeon genetic resources in semi-arid zone of Nigeria: initial results fromcharacterisation studies. Proc. INFPD Workshop and General Meeting, M'Bour, Senegal. Horst R. (1988). Native fowl as reservoir for genome and major gene with direct and indirect effect on productive adaptability. Pp. 99-105 in Proc. 18th World Poult. Cong., Nagoya, Japan. Ibe S.N. and Nwakalor C.N. (1987). Growth pattern performance in broilers. Influence of genotype andmanagement on isometry of growth. Poult. Sci. 66, 1274-1284. Islam M.S. and Dutta R.K. (2010). Morphometric analysis of indigenous, exotic and crossbred chickens (Gallus domesticus) in Rajshahi. Bangladesh J. Biosciences. 18, 94-98. Maciejowski J. and ZeibaT. (1982). Genetics and Animal Breeding. Amsterdam-Oxford-New York, PWN-Polish scientific publishers, Warszama. Momoh O.M. and and Kershima D.E. (2008). Linear body measurement as predictors of body weight in Nigerian local chickens. Asset Series A. 8(2), 206-212. Ogah D.M. (2013). Canonical discriminant analysis of morphometric traits in Indigenous chicken genotypes. Trakia J. Sci. 2, 170-174. Ojo V., Fayeye T.R., Ayorinde K.L. and Olojede H. (2013). Relationship between body weight and linear body measurement in Japanese qual (Cortunix cortunix japonica). J. Sci. Res.6, 175-181. Olawunmi O.O., Salako A.E. and Afuwape A.A. (2008). Morphometric differentiation and assessment of function of the Fulani and Yoruba ecotype indigenous chickens of Nigeria. Int. J. Morphol. 26(4), 975-980. Raji A.O., Igwebuike J.U. and Usman M.T. (2009). Zoometrical body measurements and their relation with liveweight in matured local Muscovy ducks in Borno state, Nigeria. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 4(3), 58-62. Semacula J., Lusembo P., Kugonza D.R., Mutetikka D., Ssennyonjo J. and Mwesigwa M. ( 2011). Estimationof live body weight using zoometrical measurements for improved marketing of indigenous chicken in the lake. Victoria basin of Uganda.Available in: http://www. lrrd.org/lrrd23/8/sema23170. htm. Accessed Oct. 2013. SPSS Inc. (2001). Statistical Package for Social Sciences Study. SPSS for Windows, Version 20. Chicago SPSS Inc. Yeasmin T. and Howlider M.A.R. (1998). Comparative physical features, egg production and egg quality traits of normal and dwarf indigenous (Deshi) hens of Bangladesh. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 73, 191-196.